<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Green Are Zero Emission Vehicles?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greencarmagazine.net/2009/11/how-green-are-zero-emission-vehicles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greencarmagazine.net/2009/11/how-green-are-zero-emission-vehicles/</link>
	<description>Leading the Way in Alternative Fuels and Transportation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Betty Saenz EcoBroker</title>
		<link>http://www.greencarmagazine.net/2009/11/how-green-are-zero-emission-vehicles/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Saenz EcoBroker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greencarmagazine.net/?p=1797#comment-954</guid>
		<description>I drive a Prius and I know it is still not perfect yet I thought it was a good vehicle for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drive a Prius and I know it is still not perfect yet I thought it was a good vehicle for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Kirkland</title>
		<link>http://www.greencarmagazine.net/2009/11/how-green-are-zero-emission-vehicles/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Kirkland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greencarmagazine.net/?p=1797#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Until Solar, Wind, and Geothermal Power become economical, more efficient utilization of existing sources of energy is the way to go.At this point it actually takes far more energy from start to finish to use Alternative Energy since there is so much hassle and expense involved, especially in transportation.But Alternative use of conventional Energy is actually illegal ! Toward that end I would really like to see the EPA-OBD II Annual Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law closely examined and changed.As it stands right now, it is entirely possible for any Gasoline powered Vehicle from 1996 to the present to fail it&#039;s Emissions Inspection, for not emitting enough polluting Exhaust Emissions ! All such Vehicles have on board Oxygen [O2] Exhaust Sensors.These O2 Sensors are set up to detect a level of polluting Exhaust Emissions that would indicate that Gasoline is being consumed by an Engine at 14.7 parts of Air to 1 part of Fuel.If there is a low level of Oxygen, and a high level of Pollution, a Vehicle will fail it&#039;s Emissions Inspection as well it should.But Gasoline can be safely vaporized into a mixture that is 100 parts of Air to 1 part of Fuel.With this, even the largest SUV could easily get 50 + MPG and emit a fraction of the Emissions of a conventional 14.7/1 Fuel System, with an increase in Power, and much longer Engine life.I&#039;m not the first to figure this out.Far from it ! For proof, do a search on [the late] Tom Ogle, and Charles Nelson Pogue.Then, go to http://energy21.freeservers.com/bookrep.html and scan down the page to just before the update.But even if it is not to be believed that Fuel Vaporization is entirely possible, it&#039;s illegal to even attempt to do so with any Vehicle from 1996 to the present.O2 Sensors are set up to detect that Fuel is being consumed at 14.7/1. A mixture of 100 / 1 will not emit enough Polluting Exhaust Emissions to register on O2 Sensors.When such a Vehicle is connected to an OBD II Emissions Inspection Analyzer, an O2 Sensor Failure Code will be generated, which will result in a failed Emissions Inspection.O2 Sensor Exemptions are permitted for Vehicles that have been legally converted to operate on Natural Gas, Propane, or Hydrogen, and are Registered as such.But not for vaporized Gasoline.Thus, it is entirely possible under this EPA-OBD II Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law for any Gasoline powered Vehicle from 1996 to the present to fail it&#039;s Emissions Test for not emitting enough polluting Exhaust Emissions ! As long as this insane 14.7/1 Law  that only benefits Big Oil  remains in effect, the only way to make Vehicles more &quot;efficient&quot; will be to make them lighter, and smaller.This has got to change ! I have asked the Question many times ; &quot;Why is it illegal for any Gasoline powered Vehicle from 1996 to the present to emit too little polluting Exhaust Emissions&quot;? So far, not one Big Oil Executive, Politician, or Concerned Environmentalist can, or will answer the Question.Those that have bothered to reply can&#039;t seem to come up with an Answer either.Can you ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until Solar, Wind, and Geothermal Power become economical, more efficient utilization of existing sources of energy is the way to go.At this point it actually takes far more energy from start to finish to use Alternative Energy since there is so much hassle and expense involved, especially in transportation.But Alternative use of conventional Energy is actually illegal ! Toward that end I would really like to see the EPA-OBD II Annual Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law closely examined and changed.As it stands right now, it is entirely possible for any Gasoline powered Vehicle from 1996 to the present to fail it&#8217;s Emissions Inspection, for not emitting enough polluting Exhaust Emissions ! All such Vehicles have on board Oxygen [O2] Exhaust Sensors.These O2 Sensors are set up to detect a level of polluting Exhaust Emissions that would indicate that Gasoline is being consumed by an Engine at 14.7 parts of Air to 1 part of Fuel.If there is a low level of Oxygen, and a high level of Pollution, a Vehicle will fail it&#8217;s Emissions Inspection as well it should.But Gasoline can be safely vaporized into a mixture that is 100 parts of Air to 1 part of Fuel.With this, even the largest SUV could easily get 50 + MPG and emit a fraction of the Emissions of a conventional 14.7/1 Fuel System, with an increase in Power, and much longer Engine life.I&#8217;m not the first to figure this out.Far from it ! For proof, do a search on [the late] Tom Ogle, and Charles Nelson Pogue.Then, go to <a href="http://energy21.freeservers.com/bookrep.html" rel="nofollow">http://energy21.freeservers.com/bookrep.html</a> and scan down the page to just before the update.But even if it is not to be believed that Fuel Vaporization is entirely possible, it&#8217;s illegal to even attempt to do so with any Vehicle from 1996 to the present.O2 Sensors are set up to detect that Fuel is being consumed at 14.7/1. A mixture of 100 / 1 will not emit enough Polluting Exhaust Emissions to register on O2 Sensors.When such a Vehicle is connected to an OBD II Emissions Inspection Analyzer, an O2 Sensor Failure Code will be generated, which will result in a failed Emissions Inspection.O2 Sensor Exemptions are permitted for Vehicles that have been legally converted to operate on Natural Gas, Propane, or Hydrogen, and are Registered as such.But not for vaporized Gasoline.Thus, it is entirely possible under this EPA-OBD II Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law for any Gasoline powered Vehicle from 1996 to the present to fail it&#8217;s Emissions Test for not emitting enough polluting Exhaust Emissions ! As long as this insane 14.7/1 Law  that only benefits Big Oil  remains in effect, the only way to make Vehicles more &#8220;efficient&#8221; will be to make them lighter, and smaller.This has got to change ! I have asked the Question many times ; &#8220;Why is it illegal for any Gasoline powered Vehicle from 1996 to the present to emit too little polluting Exhaust Emissions&#8221;? So far, not one Big Oil Executive, Politician, or Concerned Environmentalist can, or will answer the Question.Those that have bothered to reply can&#8217;t seem to come up with an Answer either.Can you ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
